No. 22-283
Rachel Mosby v. City of Byron, Georgia
Response Waived
Tags: charge-filing charge-filing-requirements civil-rights court-doctrine fort-bend procedural-requirement summary-judgment title-vii waiver
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must a trial court apply this Court's holding in Fort Bend when a Title VII plaintiff timely argues that the defendant has waived its objection to a charge-filing requirement objection, and must the trial court ultimately decide whether the same has been waived before granting summary judgment because of the same?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Must a trial court apply this Court’s holding in Fort Bend when a Title VII plaintiff timely argues that the defendant has waived its objection to a charge-filing requirement objection, and must the trial court ultimately decide whether the same has been waived before granting summary judgment because of the same?
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-14
Waiver of right of respondent City of Byron, Georgia to respond filed.
2022-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2022)
Attorneys
City of Byron, Georgia
Adam Lowell Appel — Dermer Appel Ruder, LLC, Respondent
Adam Lowell Appel — Dermer Appel Ruder, LLC, Respondent
Rachel Mosby
Michael Devlin Cooper — Cooper Barton & Cooper, LLP, Petitioner
Michael Devlin Cooper — Cooper Barton & Cooper, LLP, Petitioner