Wessie Sims v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Whether the Court of Appeals is in conflict with Catlin
Questions Presented Whether the Court of Appeals is in conflict with Catlin. ; Whether the District Coustis in conflict with Catlin. Catlin v. United States 324 U.S. 229, (1945) argued February 1, 2, (1945) motion to . vacate the judgment and to dismiss the petition held no final decision under 128 of the judicial code. The right of appeal may be exercised only when final judgment , disposing of the cause in its entirety has heen rendered. P.324 U.S. 240. 142 F. 2d, * 781, affirmed. : ; Whether the Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment is in Conflict with zoning decisions handed down by the Law of the Land in 1926. CaseVillage of Euclid v. Ambler 272 U.S. 365 : United States Supreme Court Landmark case arqued in (1926). CaseNectow v. City of Cambridge 277 U.S. 183 (1928). Whether common pleas court order is in conflict with zoning. Where the court had jurisdiction pursuant to 42 pa. C.S.A. 933 and Philadelphia Zoning Code 14-1807. Order attached. Disclosure Statement FR.A.P. 26.1 : Wessie Sims, hereinafter referred to as the appellant has no parent companies, non-wholly owned subsidiaries, or affiliates that have issued shares to the public. The appellees, city of Philadelphia, et. al is a government entity and respective government employees. :