No. 22-329
Lu Tuan Nguyen v. David Ribal, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: bias conservatee-estate constitutional-rights deception demurrer due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sustaining of the respondent's demurrer violates the Due Process Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1. Whether the sustaining of the respondent’s demurrer is in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in light of | the respondents and their attorneys’ deception to the court and the public. 2. Whether the court was bias in ruling that Appellant is not entitled to anything in the conservatee’s estate and therefore has violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-21
Waiver of right of respondents David Ribal, Laura Tiano to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)
Attorneys
David Ribal, Laura Tiano
Cheryl L. Walsh — Law Offices of Cheryl L. Walsh, APC, Respondent
Lu T. Nguyen
Lu Tuan Nguyen — Petitioner