No. 22-333

U.S. Well Services, Inc. v. Scott Easom, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: causal-connection covid-19 employment-law mass-layoff natural-disaster plant-closing statutory-interpretation warn-act
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ERISA
Latest Conference: 2022-11-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does COVID-19 qualify as a natural disaster under the WARN Act's natural disaster exception?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Worker Adjustment and _ Retraining Notification (“WARN”) Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq., generally requires employers to provide sixty days’ notice prior to a mass layoff or plant closing. However, the WARN Act contains an exception to the sixty-day notice requirement “if the plant closing or mass layoff is due to any form of natural disaster, such as a flood, earthquake, or the drought currently ravaging the farmlands of the United States.” 29 U.S.C. § 2102(b)(2)(B). This case presents two questions which were each decided differently by the district court and the court of appeals: (1) Does COVID-19 qualify as a natural disaster under the WARN Act’s natural disaster exception, 29 U.S.C. § 2102(b)(2)(B)? (2) What causal connection is required to trigger the WARN Act’s natural disaster exception, which applies when a plant closing or mass layoff is due to any form of natural disaster?

Docket Entries

2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Easom, et al. to respond filed.
2022-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 10, 2022)

Attorneys

Scott Easom, et al.
Gabriel AssaadMcDonald Worley, Respondent
Gabriel AssaadMcDonald Worley, Respondent
United States Well Services, Inc.
David Matthew KornPhelps Dunbar LLP, Petitioner
David Matthew KornPhelps Dunbar LLP, Petitioner