No. 22-336
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-requirements criminal-sentencing due-process jury-trial prior-convictions proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2023-01-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant's prior convictions were 'committed on occasions different from one another'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1).
Docket Entries
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-22
Reply of petitioner Jason Reed filed.
2022-12-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-11-10
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2022-11-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2022.
2022-11-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 10, 2022 to December 12, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Jason Reed
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
National Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent