No. 22-353

David M. Morgan v. Arizona, et al.

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2022-10-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: court-access first-amendment juror-names press-enterprise press-enterprise-i press-enterprise-ii qualified-right qualified-right-of-access voir-dire
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-02-24 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the qualified right of access to voir dire under the First Amendment include the right to hear potential juror names during voir dire?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the qualified right of access to voir dire under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, recognized in Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501 (1984) (“Press-Enterprise I’), include the right to hear potential juror names during voir dire? 2. If the qualified First Amendment right of access to voir dire recognized in Press-Enterprise I does not include the right to hear potential juror names during voir dire, did the Arizona Supreme Court misapply the logic prong of the test articulated in Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1 (1986) (“Press-Enterprise IT”) when it held that there is also no presumptive right to hear juror names during voir dire under that test? ii LIST OF ALL PARTIES All parties with an interest in the case are listed in the caption. At the Superior Court and Court of Appeals level, another reporter, Terri Jo Neff, participated in the case as an with Morgan. She declined to join the appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court, see App. at 3a, fn. 1, and is not a party with an interest in this matter.

Docket Entries

2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-12
2022-12-30
2022-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 23, 2023.
2022-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2022 to January 23, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-23
Response Requested. (Due December 23, 2022)
2022-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona, et al. to respond filed.
2022-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)
2022-08-18
Application (22A149) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 12, 2022.
2022-08-16
Application (22A149) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 12, 2022 to October 12, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Arizona, et al.
Jeffrey Lee SparksArizona Attorney General, Respondent
David M. Morgan
Gregg P. LeslieASU College of Law First Amendment Clinic, Petitioner