No. 22-362

Matt Huffman, President of the Ohio Senate, et al. v. Meryl Neiman, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2022-10-18
Status: GVR
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: congressional-elections congressional-redistricting constitutional-interpretation elections-clause judicial-review ohio-supreme-court proportional-representation redistricting state-constitution state-legislature
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether state courts violate the Elections Clause by enforcing state constitutional limits on a state legislature's power to regulate congressional elections

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Elections Clause vests in “the Legislature” of “each State” and in “Congress” the power to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections. U.S. Const., art. I, §4, cl. 1. Ohio’s legislature recently exercised that power by adopting a congressional district map. The Ohio Supreme Court found that the map violated the Ohio Constitution and invalidated it. It determined that any map must ensure that Democratic candidates are likely to win six of Ohio’s fifteen House seats to provide adequately proportional representation. Pet.App.19a. The questions presented are: 1. Whether state courts violate the Elections Clause by enforcing state constitutional limits on a state legislature’s power to regulate congressional elections. 2. Whether state courts violate the Elections Clause by dictating the results that congressional district maps must achieve or by crafting extraconstitutional rules for state legislatures to follow when drawing such maps.

Docket Entries

2023-08-01
Judgment and mandate issued.
2023-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Moore</i> v. <i>Harper</i>, 600 U. S. ___ (2023).
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-30
Reply of petitioners Senate President Matt Huffman, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-19
Brief of respondent League of Women Voters of Ohio in opposition filed.
2022-12-19
2022-10-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 19, 2022, for all respondents.
2022-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 17, 2022 to December 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2022)

Attorneys

League of Women Voters of Ohio
Robert Allen Long Jr.Covington & Burling, LLP, Respondent
Robert Allen Long Jr.Covington & Burling, LLP, Respondent
Meryl Neiman, et al.
Abha KhannaElias Law Group LLP, Respondent
Abha KhannaElias Law Group LLP, Respondent
Senate President Matt Huffman, et al.
William Stuart DornetteTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Petitioner
William Stuart DornetteTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Petitioner