Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the existence of a state post-deprivation process preclude a procedural due process claim
(a) only where a pre-deprivation process that satisfied constitutional standards would be impracticable, such as because the deprivation was a random or unauthorized act of an errant state official (the rule in ten circuits and under decisions of the highest courts in eight states), or
(b) in any case in which, even though compliance with constitutional standards in a pre-deprivation process was practicable, the state post-deprivation process provides some form of remedy for the constitutional deficiency of the pre-deprivation process (the longstanding rule in the Eleventh Circuit)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the existence of a state post-deprivation process preclude a procedural due-process claim
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-06
Reply of petitioner Bronwyn Randel filed. (Distributed)
2023-01-24
Brief of respondent Rabun County School District in opposition filed.
2022-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 24, 2023.
2022-11-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2022 to January 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2022)
2022-09-14
Application (22A217) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 21, 2022.
2022-08-09
Application (22A217) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 21, 2022 to November 20, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.