Roger David Towers v. Mike Hamasaki
1. In light of CAED district judge 's admission
that they are "wholly unable to handle civil
matters and the district court 's order assigning
this case to district judge "NONE "; was the
referral to a magistrate lawful ?
2. In light of the district judge 's ruling claiming
: that summary judgment is unavailable on
habeas; and who has otherwise failed to follow
clearly established law; should this Court
invoke its supervisory authority to prevent a
systemic abuse of discretion and/or complete
miscarriage of justice ? '
3. Is California Code of Civil Procedure §527.8, a
statute which fails to include any useful
standards to the situations which it applies,
void for vagueness?
Whether the referral to a magistrate was lawful given the district judge's admission of being 'wholly unable to handle civil matters