No. 22-391

Shahrouz Jahanshahi v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: anti-SLAPP anti-slapp-statute appellate-procedure appellate-review case-transfer civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process ghostwriting judicial-procedure standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does California anti-SLAPP statute protect illegal activity?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED John Adams eloquently stated “we are nation of laws, not men.” This petition presents an opportunity for this Court to hold whether the Superior Court of California has adhered to rule of the law or has acted in excess of jurisdiction. The Due Process Clause of the laws guaranteed under the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment requires, fair, unbiased, impartial adjudication of the matters before the tribunal. The questions presented are: e (1) Does California anti-SALPP statute Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16 protect illegal, unlawful activity? . « (2) Can an Independent Calendar (IC) | judge of the California court transfer the action to another department of the } court whereas that authority is vested . with presiding judge or master calendar judge? e (8) Whether ghostwriting should be allowed and promoted where there is divided Federal Circuits on this topic? e (4) Does the Due Process Clause of the law require participation of all three ap: pellate justices for the oral argument as recognized by California Supreme Court?

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent Benjamin Tarn Rosenfeld to respond filed.
2022-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2022)
2022-07-29
Application (22A78) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 15, 2022.
2022-07-19
Application (22A78) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 16, 2022 to October 15, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Benjamin Tarn Rosenfeld
Harini P. RaghupathiSingleton Schreiber, LLP, Respondent
Harini P. RaghupathiSingleton Schreiber, LLP, Respondent
Shahrouz Jahanshahi
Shahrouz Jahanshahi — Petitioner
Shahrouz Jahanshahi — Petitioner