Shahrouz Jahanshahi v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al.
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Does California anti-SLAPP statute protect illegal activity?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED John Adams eloquently stated “we are nation of laws, not men.” This petition presents an opportunity for this Court to hold whether the Superior Court of California has adhered to rule of the law or has acted in excess of jurisdiction. The Due Process Clause of the laws guaranteed under the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment requires, fair, unbiased, impartial adjudication of the matters before the tribunal. The questions presented are: e (1) Does California anti-SALPP statute Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16 protect illegal, unlawful activity? . « (2) Can an Independent Calendar (IC) | judge of the California court transfer the action to another department of the } court whereas that authority is vested . with presiding judge or master calendar judge? e (8) Whether ghostwriting should be allowed and promoted where there is divided Federal Circuits on this topic? e (4) Does the Due Process Clause of the law require participation of all three ap: pellate justices for the oral argument as recognized by California Supreme Court?