No. 22-40

Isiah Dozier v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 18-usc-1791 criminal-defendant criminal-defense evidentiary-standard knowledge-requirement prohibited-object rock-v-arkansas rock-v-armenia sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a Trial Court prohibit a criminal Defendant from calling a witness in his own defense, by weighing the probative value of the expected witness testimony, or is such action an arbitrary exclusion of a witness in violation of the Sixth Amendment and the Supreme Court's Holding in Rock v. Arkansas?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented for the Supreme Court concern the Constitutional right of a Criminal Defendant to call a witness in his own defense at trial and the elements that must be proven in order to convict an individual of possession of a “prohibited object” under 18 U.S.C. § 1791. This case presents questions including: 1) Cana Trial Court prohibit a criminal Defendant from calling a witness in his own defense, by weighing the probative value of the expected witness testimony, or is such action an arbitrary exclusion of a witness in violation of the Sixth Amendment and the Supreme Court’s Holding in Rock v. Arkansas? See Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 54-55 (1987). 2) Does a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1791 require proof that the Defendant had knowledge that he possessed the “prohibited object” which he was charged with possessing?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2022)

Attorneys

Isiah Dozier
Joseph Grant BallardArk Ag Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Joseph Grant BallardArk Ag Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent