No. 22-406

Rafael Friedrichsen v. Jose Ramon Rodriguez, et al.

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2022-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: constitutional-right-to-jury-trial due-process eeoc rehearing title-vii writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2023-02-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

did-the-supreme-court-of-texas-fail-to-maintain-uniformity

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Supreme Court of Texas fail to maintain uniformity in decisions when it denied the Writ of Mandamus regarding whether a timely filing of an EEOC charge is a Jurisdictional or Limitation Requirement to Title VII Suits? 2. Did the Supreme Court of Texas violate the Petitioner’s due process rights when it failed to provide valid reasons in the disposition of Writ of Mandamus and Rehearing? 3. Whether the Appellate Court’s denial of the Motion to Recall or Withdraw Mandate violate Petitioner’s due process rights? 4. Whether Appellate Court erred in affirming in granting Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment in violation of the Petitioner’s Constitutional Right to Jury Trial? i

Docket Entries

2023-02-27
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-01
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent Rodriguez, et al. to respond filed.
2022-10-27

Attorneys

Friedrichsen, Rafael
S. Bruce HiranHiran & Streeter Law Firm, Petitioner
Rodriguez, et al.
James Christopher MartinReed Smith LLP, Respondent