No. 22-415
Mark Elliott Stuart v. Arizona
Response Waived
Tags: civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-law due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech municipal-code statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Scottsdale Revised Code 19-13 is overbroad and violates the First Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether Scottsdale Revised Code 19-13 is overbroad and _ violates the First ; Amendment? (2) Whether Scottsdale Revised Code 19-13 is , unconstitutionally vague and violates the Fourteenth Amendment? , ii .
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent City of Scottsdale to respond filed.
2022-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2022)
2022-08-19
Application (22A154) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 31, 2022.
2022-08-15
Application (22A154) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2022 to October 31, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
City of Scottsdale
Kenneth M. Flint — City of Scottdale Prosecutor's Offce, Respondent
Kenneth M. Flint — City of Scottdale Prosecutor's Offce, Respondent