No. 22-420
In Re Ohio, ex rel. Terpsehore P. Maras
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-challenge election-law election-observers equal-protection fundamental-right-to-vote independent-candidates party-representation political-parties strict-scrutiny voting-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Ohio law allowing for Republican and Democratic Parties' election observers while requiring Independent candidates to obtain consent from four other candidates before appointing election observers violates the Equal Protection Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is whether Ohio law allowing for Republican and Democratic Parties’ election observers in any Ohio precinct or board of ; elections while requiring that statewide Independent candidates obtain consent from:four other candidates _ before ‘being allowed to appoint election. observers © violatés the Equal Protection Clause of the ‘14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-19
Supplemental brief of petitioner Ex. Rel. Terpsehore P. Maras filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent Frank LaRose, Ohio Secretary of State to respond filed.
2022-11-02
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
2022-11-02
Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed.
Attorneys
Ex. Rel. Terpsehore P. Maras
Frank LaRose, Ohio Secretary of State
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent