No. 22-422
Kendall Streb v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: abuse-of-discretion brady-violation civil-procedure criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence-concealment government-misconduct hearing prosecutorial-misconduct witness-payments
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-12-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying a hearing into the government's alleged discovery violations
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : When the government intentionally conceals Brady evidence (payments and benefits to witnesses) on the eve of trial — in violation of DOJ policy, ABA co Standards for the Prosecutorial Function, and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — is an evidentiary hearing required?
Docket Entries
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-07
Motion (22M28) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2022-10-19
MOTION (22M28) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-11
Motion (22M28) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2022-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent