In a peer-on-peer harassment Title IX claim, under what circumstances can a school district be liable when a plaintiff relies on the harassment of others to satisfy the actual knowledge element?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In a peer-on-peer harassment Title IX claim, under what circumstances can a school district be liable when a plaintiff relies on the harassment of others to satisfy the actual knowledge element? 2. Must a Title IX plaintiff prove further actionable harassment that is caused by the school’s deliberate indifference, or is it sufficient that the plaintiff was left vulnerable to a possibility of harassment? 3. Did the Sixth Circuit err when it reversed the District Court on Respondents’ “after” claims under Title IX where neither Jane nor Sally Doe experienced any further actionable harassment once the school district had actual notice, and where the district responded to Sally Doe’s complaint in an objectively reasonable manner by involving the police and officering social and emotional supports?