No. 22-425

Robin Carnahan, Administrator of the General Services Administration v. Carolyn Maloney, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-11-07
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Relisted (7) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 5-usc-2954 article-iii-standing civil-procedure congress-members congressional-oversight disclosure-request executive-agency information-disclosure separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11 (distributed 7 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether individual Members of Congress have Article III standing to sue an executive agency to compel it to disclose information that the Members have requested under 5 U.S.C. 2954

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether individual Members of Congress have Article III standing to sue an executive agency to compel it to disclose information that the Members have requested under 5 U.S.C. 2954. (I)

Docket Entries

2023-07-28
Judgment issued.
2023-06-26
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the case. Justice Jackson dissents from the vacatur of the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and would instead dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.
2023-06-20
Response to suggestion of mootness from respondents Maloney, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-06-14
Suggestion of mootness filed by petitioner Robin Carnahan, Administrator of the General Services Administration. (Distributed)
2023-06-07
Letter from counsel for respondents notifying the Court of their voluntary dismissal entered in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia received.
2023-05-15
Petition GRANTED.
2023-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-02-22
Reply of petitioner Robin Carnahan, Administrator of the General Services Administrator filed. (Distributed)
2023-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-06
2022-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 6, 2023.
2022-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2023 to February 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2023.
2022-11-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2022 to January 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2022)

Attorneys

Maloney
David C. VladeckGeorgetown Law, Respondent
David C. VladeckGeorgetown Law, Respondent
Maloney et al.
Scott Lawrence NelsonPublic Citizen Litigation Group, Respondent
Scott Lawrence NelsonPublic Citizen Litigation Group, Respondent
Robin Carnahan, Administrator of the General Services Administration
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Petitioner
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Petitioner