No. 22-439
Fraternal Order of Police, United States Park Police Labor Committee v. Department of the Interior
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure employment-law federal-circuit judicial-review standing statutory-interpretation union union-standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's interpretation of 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(1) is incorrect in finding that an employee's union, on the employee's behalf and with the employee's consent, does not have standing to seek judicial review under that statute?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(1) is incorrect in finding that an employee’s union, on the employee’s behalf and with the employee’s consent, does not have standing to seek judicial review under that statute?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent Department of the Interior to respond filed.
2022-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Department of the Interior
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Fraternal Order of Police, United States Park Police Labor Committee
Patrick Joseph McAndrew — Law Offices of Patrick J. McAndrew, Petitioner
Patrick Joseph McAndrew — Law Offices of Patrick J. McAndrew, Petitioner