No. 22-464
Tags: appellate-review automatic-vacatur criminal-procedure judicial-discretion pretrial-procedure right-to-counsel self-representation structural-error
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's erroneous pretrial self-representation categorically constitutes structural error
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a defendant’s erroneous pretrial selfrepresentation categorically constitutes structural error, thereby requiring automatic vacatur of the convictions, where the defendant had counsel at trial and did not irretrievably lose any rights or defenses in the interim. (I)
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-31
Reply of petitioner United States filed.
2023-01-17
Brief of respondent Saleem Hakim in opposition filed.
2022-11-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2022.
2022-11-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2022 to January 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2022)
2022-11-07
Application (22A275) denied by Justice Thomas.
2022-11-03
Application (22A275) to extend further the time from November 14, 2022 to December 12, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2022-09-30
Application (22A275) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 14, 2022.
2022-09-29
Application (22A275) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 13, 2022 to November 12, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Saleem Hakim
Traci L. Lovitt — Jones Day, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner