Whether courts may displace state contract interpretation principles with a federal common law rule requiring 'clear intent' to opt out of the Federal Arbitration Act's default standards

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, in interpreting contracts that contain both an arbitration provision and a choice-of-law provision, courts may displace state principles of contract interpretation with a federal general common law rule requiring “clear intent” to opt out of the Federal Arbitration Act’s default standards and apply state arbitration standards.