No. 22-481

Daphne Moore v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: curtilage fourth-amendment home home-curtilage police-technology reasonable-expectation-of-privacy reasonable-expectation-privacy search search-and-seizure surveillance surveillance-camera
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-05-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person's home and curtilage is a Fourth Amendment search

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home and curtilage is a Fourth Amendment search. i

Docket Entries

2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-01
Reply of petitioner Daphne Moore filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2023-04-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentCertificate of Word Count
2023-03-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 14, 2023.
2023-03-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 15, 2023.
2023-01-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2023 to March 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-01-13
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2023-01-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 16, 2023.
2023-01-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2023 to February 16, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-12-22
Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-12-21
Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-12-20
Brief amicus curiae of Muslim Public Affairs Council filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-12-15
Response Requested. (Due January 17, 2023)
2022-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 22, 2022)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-09-14
Application (22A224) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 20, 2022.
2022-09-09
Application (22A224) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 21, 2022 to November 20, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service

Attorneys

Cato Institute
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Daphne Moore
Nathan Freed Wessler — American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Petitioner
Nathan Freed Wessler — American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Petitioner
Institute for Justice
Joshua Aaron Windham — Institute for Justice, Amicus
Joshua Aaron Windham — Institute for Justice, Amicus
Muslim Public Affairs Council
Joshua Craig McDaniel — Harvard Law School Religious Freedom Clinic, Amicus
Joshua Craig McDaniel — Harvard Law School Religious Freedom Clinic, Amicus
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press et al.
Bruce David Brown — Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press, Amicus
Bruce David Brown — Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press, Amicus
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent