No. 22-5002

Richard Winn v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-922 18-usc-925 armed-career-criminal constructive-possession criminal-firearms sentencing-enhancement shular-v-united-states statutory-interpretation third-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Petitioner should have been sentenced as an Armed Career Criminal (ACCA)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is whether or not the Petitioner, RICHARD WINN, should have been sentenced as an Armed Career Criminal (ACCA) requiring the imposition of a mandatory sentence of fifteen (15) years in violation of 18 U.S.C.§922(g) and §925(e)(1) wherein the Third Circuit Court of Appeals relied upon United States v. Daniels, 915 F.3d 148 (3 Cir. 2019). It further concluded that although this Court's decision in Shular v. United States, 140 S.Ct. 779 (2020), altered the analytical approach of Daniels, that it had no impact in the Third Circuit's review and the ultimate . decision that it had previously had reached in Daniels. The second question presented is whether or not there was sufficient evidence to c convict the Petitioner with the constructive possession of firearms which were located in the premises searched by the authorities. il

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2022)

Attorneys

Richard Winn
Christopher G. FurlongLaw Offices of Christopher G. Furlong, Petitioner
Christopher G. FurlongLaw Offices of Christopher G. Furlong, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent