Was petitioner denied her Fourth Amendment right to a pro se habeas corpus

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was petitioner denied her Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution . tight to a pro se habeas corpus in the US district of Oregon? 2. Was petitioner falsely arrested for Count 1 — burglary in the first degree of the indictment violating the petitioner’s constitutional right against unreasonable searches and seizures protected by the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution? . : 3. Did the petitioner suffer malicious criminal prosecution of four separate burglary in the first degree counts of the indictment violating petitioner’s constitutional right against unreasonable searches and seizures protected ' by the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution? 4. Did the petitioner suffer malicious criminal prosecution and false arrest of Count 2 and 3 (identity theft) of the indictment after lay witness ' testified (TR8t067422 April 7" 2015) to solicitation 4#&e6ercion of the petitioner allowing police to acquire evidence necessary to commence a criminal prosecution inducing the petitioner to engage in a criminal act QUESTIONS PRESENTED CONTINUE PAGE 2 4. that petitioner would otherwise have not committed violating the petitioner’s constitutional right to due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution and violating petitioner’s right against unreasonable search and seizures protected by the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution? 5. Was the petitioner denied the Supremacy clause of Article VI — , Paragraph 2 of the US Constitution when petitioner objected to the lower court when denied a quick and speedy trial pursuant the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution and when the petitioner refused to to sign away her right to a quick and speedy trial in writing? 6. Did the Oregon Court of Appeals issue an ambiguous state response when they affirmed without opinion petitioner’s federal claim of being denied a quick and speedy trial pursuant the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution? sles Was the petitioner denied the Supremacy,clause of Article VI — BATES Paragraph 2 of the US Constitution during direct appeal to the Oregon Court of Appeals?