Whether the District Court for the District of South Carolina erred in dismissing the case on the ground that the petitioners lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the 2020 election results in South Carolina

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . ; The DSE-Wh Co LOE ibe sd 1 c€ ot ocothy el Goud Pooline th eget 9 Lolitle DWsstsed Siew, ke Chei8 39 Mobo PY hse Ae Leon Le MWS ANesisb-wle Teh&Y 1g Wefe hog ef LE Wy beCit63h CIC CAD. Ground, Ae Dk Comwt far Lhe DisbveL a Soe Carshist” Vea fash dissed 6f Aha Jow “bx Ade 0618 Rerok oth Rewewethehier Mek “use On ts18: SePhie Cowk freecdheck seh fwth v2 Fxtat uu weotyes Sues . GWogad C, sho wMbod Desivexe Courl fv Ao Disb tf oF Soe Cowi2+ AES iskCeti£érucs “fe W318 406 Cow BLho/ Arivec at RcKereece bx thich Ais nse “ps bearded v4 Le DBEDCE Cogé fo Sye LA Lk 0 Seelh Cela g. rtd He Unk Seles 22. CoulL of Affewts fer Le6 Foul CY Cwk 22h Cortsthcle ? des, 2/ Pecediurs/ Dve Pececs. Crud Bhe Oskvel Couk bar Me Dishuc& of Soalh Ceres WMA Lhe Cowk tH $74 far Me fovlh Crorcwl dbeywek REktede ao Lib wta Jevletrdé Arpesbacteés BRLAESGout She Cowk of Aiterky far Be Lorkh Crew hk Mbt Pe Q Lolkillt SESS Grd oF the et © 0 bo bess GI Cork Of Mote wee terolbe gad ehincells bowid~ #o Sté Mek jesfice wes dete”