No. 22-5019
IFP
Tags: constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process jackson-v-virginia legal-sufficiency mistake-of-fact self-defense
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under the legal sufficiency standard of Jackson v. Virginia, a court violates due process by concluding that self-defense and mistake-of-fact are mutually exclusive and cannot be considered simultaneously in a legal sufficiency review if the facts support consideration of both
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Under the legal sufficiency standard of Jackson v. Virginia, does a court violate due process by concluding that self-defense and mistake-of-fact are mutually exclusive and cannot be considered simultaneously in a legal sufficiency review if the facts support consideration of both?
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-09-30
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2022-08-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2022.
2022-08-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2022 to September 30, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-07-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 31, 2022.
2022-07-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 1, 2022 to August 31, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Texas