No. 22-5021
Palani Karupaiyan v. L. Naganda, et al.
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-rights conjugal-rights due-process false-arrest guardian-ad-litem injunctive-relief parental-rights pro-bono-counsel right-of-access-to-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A) DISTRICT COURT DENYING PLAINTIFF(S) REQUEST TO APPOINT PRO BONO ATTORNEY AND/OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM IS ERROR. B) DIST COURT DENYING AN ORDER PROHIBITING THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY FAMILY DIVISION AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FROM PLAINTIFF'S ARREST IS ERROR. C) SUA SPONTE ORDER OF MISSING SAC SHOULD BE VACATED D) DIST COURT DENYING PERMANENT INJUNCTION RELIEFS IS ERROR. E) DIST COURT DISMISSING THE SAC UNDER RULE 8 DISMISSAL IS ERROR when dist Court failed to review the complaint under rule 8(f), rule 12(e ), rule 12(f) and Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 @ 684. 2
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent County of Middlesex to respond filed.
2022-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2022)
Attorneys
County of Middlesex
Michael S. Williams — Office of County Counsel, Respondent
Michael S. Williams — Office of County Counsel, Respondent