No. 22-5025

Arthur Luther McKinney v. Gary Painter, Sheriff, Midland County, Texas, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies prisoner-litigation standing
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did McKinney exhaust the administrative remedies required by the PLRA?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . \, Did MCKinney (Satioky he éexhaushaw a _ | Require met of he PLR: Zuen Proud ne fftMe skp fino of midland tourty qticvance proeedure was made unavailable « bo him, o, Ord MK mney allege wir SufFerevt <pecifierly a Materal Foct of “ Substowhial Effort Exephow ” | Yo Yhe Exhaushow Requirement « | . |

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2022)

Attorneys

Arthur Luther McKinney
Arthur Luther McKinney — Petitioner
Arthur Luther McKinney — Petitioner