No. 22-5029
Christopher Michael Fairley v. United States
Tags: appellate-review court-ruling criminal-procedure due-process error-preservation judicial-discretion legal-objection preservation-of-error standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether parties to a criminal proceeding sufficiently preserve error by informing the court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether parties to a criminal proceeding sufficiently preserve error by informing the court—when the court ruling or order is made or sought—of the action the party wishes the court to take, or the party's objection to the court's action and the grounds for that objection, or whether courts of appeals are instead free to impose additional preservation requirements? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2022)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent