No. 22-5037
Stephen Todd Booker v. Florida
Tags: banks-v-dretke brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland constitutional-due-process criminal-procedure disclosure due-diligence due-process exculpatory-evidence government-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May courts impose a due diligence requirement for Brady claims
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: 1. May courts impose a due diligence requirement for Brady claims that focuses on the actions of the defense rather than the government, effectively limiting Brady’s reach to evidence that cannot be obtained by means other than government disclosure? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-30
Reply of petitioner Stephen Booker filed. (Distributed)
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-02
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2022-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Stephen Booker