No. 22-5039

Randy Scott Diehl v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief post-conviction-review state-court-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the state courts denied his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and actual innocence without a meaningful evidentiary hearing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : fae purypotiz02 heel eviol A Cbanitaizere. oF bygpentiiatliny _Faas 22h Fit Lhpeadir Caucaz at bgoaels bs Lvetd. ___ Cal sefizzeriwtidz <p” bob THES Lapse 2. Witiol Aol lotatTlivieds Co Sri zatTaetel Eseeo “olstretatally® —_NEWENCES. A. Suen ve@niel, Hew) Dots THHS AfPeer Tie ___ Abate son, S072 US G9 2 3. PuesuaneTa_AkiL v Biggers, 409 Us [Be (1472), js A “peice Desceiprio" al “Clementtad. Grcr" id me HL Was Die. Dewito Coulse ara ‘aeiniok stage” ue -niors. During Del ipemation|S Ara WLTHok 7 _-__ Cdesceshing onneR) Renate braioee freceeoinigs | Reririod be Cooke C hppealiailirs,, Ocioed Apail 84, £02 Diet v Shinn # Zl16272 ( AfflenlOIx , EX 5) (Revigw Requesteo) oe US. Diseecer (Court foe. AnizosA (Apoelax , Ex 4) ; v [Stliniel # @VIF-01SZ8 = P4x—OLR Crm ) Reavigw 2 west . if oF Dawid.» 3. Britta fee Pserticortensgh oF Ps Conv iCT on) RIE es Ren'nor —_P2iped onl Tintin, 22, 2014 ___ Frnrirenin Cour of Appeals + \CA-CRIB0632. RPO Stare v Dede Capozalx, Yy 7 4. @ritioal fea PosrConviction! Revita), Decide Aueust, 2018 —_Maeicopa (unity Supeveioa Couel, * CROAT = 1422-001 -OT __ _ Stre v Dice Cnppentore, KO) __fucizonia. Supasme. Cour, # CRIT—O32Bfa Sev Deu. ( appeniae, 2) 4. a bo. /ieeer Revita of Ties CaivietioN Necin¢h Suse 24, Zor —_Api2onia Court of Appeals (CA-CRile-~ 0377 Sev Diet pppenalx, Gx) Tle 9b CTetTS a ” Questions PhesetTe4 RQ Revyiéu) Thole of GnitesTS 3 _Crmetion’s 7a Repoars/aaoeas. iN THis ese _ feritionier’s Srtmmettol THs use fT Reasenls WaitellyeriatKe) SHald be bt i2—-34 7/2) 0/7, fom Nes Fprinf — — ——_#tl _Aizensa Couerof Appeals — a Meeps De Sford 6.29. Zap] , #7 ba : 1 tb De ied oP Berrien for Revie NIVZ0ID df US. Disneicr-Counr Fee AgizensA a _#F CS. Cour of Appeals Fo net Den COW 4.29, 202% __ #b SM nricopn. Supeeion Court, PCR Ruling, 8.7.2018 FT Ae oye hypals, PRPC Dnico I-22. 204 a a Lae ot rea Mgrotecies _ __hrcizepiav falltisteatté, 494 US 224 (149) BO Alle lait, 535 US OBS (pont) ___ beecttr uv hikablimias, 507 US WG (1993) __ bacinlv Lewespeet, 142 5b 160 (2e22) BE ___ Onis v Agsla, £76 Us 257 (als) Tau hee libiot sth, 207 YS 3B (19te) __ Tacksanl v VieGlsii, #43 YS. 300 (929) te ___kerteakos v Upitea. Stores, 228 Us Feb GHG) ___ Maalfeal V Bewmntité, HIZ UE 98 (1977p __ eh v bisgees, AOI US 6p (1972) eS hence MUTA Sees, B47 Ys 727 (9sy) __festtil V Snisi, Hod us We (1983) __ gery Unirres Sates, 314 ye Hen (1943) Yuen Staves v Ctante, Abb HB (G4) 1B ZL __[illiaas\ Taglet, 52LUE B62 (Zoa2) _30_ ___ Wank v Allesl, 558 US 240 (2olo) 0, 3) _—_fepenat (ouers of Appel. (uses _ Query Steuer, 244 P24 340 (ab, Zoos) IBID _—Claak v linasey, 936 24 467 (a4 6,209) IG _Cueris v Duval, 124 63d _t Cm), 977) __fimir2 v Hazen, 533 Ad 124 (0A, Zoe) A Reis v Toss, 232 24 470 (Cal, 2e03) IB ——Muslacini lamsague, 59a E44 20 (004, Ze) 20 ee 2, => US Ossritu ticles AntlQMGSTS 5 B Z> _¢ ; BZ> a Ye X__ ZB USC § CBG(bYIMa) BB _ ge use silesht) 22 uses gos (aiy@) 99, 1b 80,31, ZB USE S$ ZastMli) NF, BI, BB 28 USCS 7103/9) a Ae Sars. Srptorey Provisions _Agizenia Revise) Srerures, Tile 1B, G4 B407@) 1 Aides et 78 5y yocase (oueT, RiKa) IB Ailes 08 Teke Saceuse Leucr, hielo) 21,24 es a nn , es (Peles) lL. Opener Dénsgial 6 Cecribicate..o8 Appesd iad Gr (Cha ___ Apwile. 24, Zoz2.__( happen, 6) Z. Onver Dénvinis Weir of Hapers Coens SDC Alo. VIF 1568 PHX-ALR~ TR Thy 22, 2074 _Cngpessdi x4... Boia Rogues) —__ 3. renca/ Lem Désinks, Prize Ga Resi¢ess Az. Suptenue(Z no. CRI1= 0328 fi A Memoractounm Decision aeGiewie, Cosvierion Ar twor of agrals sso. l-CABlo t37 Tine, 24, Poi] npn, Gp | Steet Of Tureispigpon _ TUMGELAGTS. OR Of Mee 6 L. Cepia Minigiog A Cugeritritare.oF hyglenlioliity _. ere Apeil 24, 2022. ( hyena, BS), 2. nate Maipile ldelttt Habees logaes D254 _ Hs is 1 Hates. Cagis. Aen) Unidee 2B UC E224 _Sujyinne Caiel bag TBUCEUZERL) AsO abso fag Kloof Tite. Siypibiaae Couel LULES.: _ Notigies THis CoukT Thar 28 USC B 2463 (a) Mee Ger eph. AS Hvdig OTHER feeTe, as i a Spzures _[NVoVEd Js

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Brnovich, et al. to respond filed.
2022-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Mark Brnovich, et al.
Eliza YbarraOffice of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Eliza YbarraOffice of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Randy Diehl
Randy Scott Diehl — Petitioner
Randy Scott Diehl — Petitioner