No. 22-5040

Priscilla Ann Ellis v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-07-06
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: article-iii constitutional-rights criminal-charges criminal-procedure due-process extradition indictment right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-11-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Right-to-counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1, Does a criminal defendant have the right to an Attorney Immediaetely once criminal charges are presented in an Indicment? 2. If criminal defendant is on the record in Court telling the Judge that they were denied the right to call their attorney until AFTER they saw the Judge, were they denied sixth Amendment protections to an attorney per the Us Constittution? 3. Should the Judge have stopped the 5.1 Hearing after the defendant told him that she was denied the right to call and appeat before him with an attorney? 4, Was the criminal defendant unlawfully extradited to another district and state violating Article III, 2, cl 3 because she was denied the right to appear before the Judge at 5.1 hearing with an attorney ? t 3

Docket Entries

2022-11-14
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-10-25
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-12
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Priscilla Ellis
Priscilla Ann Ellis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent