No. 22-5043

Romeo Valentin Sanchez v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-law enhanced-sentencing indecent-acts mandatory-minimum military-justice sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation uniform-code-of-military-justice
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in relying upon a now-excised provision to trigger a mandatory minimum penalty under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 920) was broadened in 2006 to include crimes of “indecent acts.” Article 120 was reamended in 2011 to excise the indecent acts provision. Petitioner was charged and convicted of an indecent act in 2011 during the brief period it was a crime under Article 120. That same conviction was relied upon to trigger an enhanced 25 to 50 year sentence range under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e). The question presented is: whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in relying upon a now-excised provision to trigger a mandatory minimum penalty under 18 U.S.C. § 2251¢e). i

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Romeo Valentin Sanchez
Shehnoor K GrewalOffice of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent