Did the Ninth Circuit Court properly deny habeas petition

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the Ninth Circuit Court properly deny habeas petition where petitioner made substantial showing requirement at. least: described a burden that the petitioner meet the threshold condition for the requirement of a certificate of appealability (COA). Where petitioner showing indicated an issue not defective, that the issue is debatable : ' among jurists. Did the petitioner meet the core of habeas corpus while incarcerated sought grievance that challanged procedures that ; relate to petitioner's early release from prison sentence where the decisions of Calif. Depart. of Corrections would not effect his courtimposed prison term, but did. deny his release-on-parole by being held 35 days pass 120 days pursuant Penal Code 3041(b)(2) any decision of the parole panel finding an inmate suitable for parole shall become ° final within 120 days. Did the procedural defect deny due process pursuant core habeas corpus subjecting petitioner to invalidityyvof: confinement or its duration. Did the District Courts denial and to _ address why (COA) should issue and issues presented was proper for the petitioner showed any confinement or to particulars effecting his duration are the province of habeas corpus. Did the petitioners prior 1983 civil action for. damages meet requirements for unlawfulness of : . confinement by procedures deprive petitioner of relief that required first have proof by court's issurance of habeas corpus, where state , supreme court denys as untimely for calif. court of appeals denys case number over and over and to claim not to have orders for case number ‘ ; for superior court meet due process for diligence for habeas corpus. I