Whether the oath of a State's witness is valid in a criminal proceeding when the witness is testifying from a foreign country by video-satellite transmission and is sworn in by a notary of that foreign country, not by an official of a U.S. court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED GUESTION A ts the oath of the State's witvess wrvalid iw & criminal Proceeding whew that wit ess testifying From a For eign coumtyy hy video~ Satelite trons sien 1'5 swore 1” by a wotany of fhat for erga Couwtey , wot by av official ofa US. Count? Does that invalid oath make the witwess’ — pesty ng uy Wiad mussa blp dae fo q Tekh of the S, ad Ain end ments Cons fe ot at ron Clacise, 1€, tHe Oat, Pp Ones a H violate G cleferdautlc Dihs ks a Feu toval co ae Due Proce ss of the FFL Bnerad met 2 , OF extra ~ ordi many tapertance yux¥h Hes nuliag | by Phe chestrrver Gount, does jf pen the door far other olistruct counts Jo deve Jaze Sper eudect Iter pretat seis of the United Stokes Chm stydatyay 2 , _ Bt Ooes failure to otve a Mivrewely woraig Auriga custodial Loterrogatiois Moke ary Staten eats Concern sug Bard wheres adbioy) satel ‘ssabb at tre 2 SF exfra~ are, wary luaporta vce 13, obes thes txalate a defeuvdaks Hight apes? Self-pwepia wat sod) ander Pye Process Claase of the Fi ft Amerdin eatof the Lluthed Shales Cou shy Jupon 2 UESTEON C2 Does the presentetou by prosece tion F False test mony Vhroagh a Stehe! witness during a Qi ni wal Procee diag Con sky huel ¢ @ Cighs violeties wher the State ky ew the testimony wes fake? af oF Constitutional Low € 990 aud o wolatiea of @ deferdaski Que Oocess right ky ofac frab under the fF Amerdamea) of theo United Shufos Cestechor ?