Whether the respondent properly sought publicity when dismissed without a full record, although requested, and whether the respondent's right to disclose the full record is compelled by the First Amendment

No question identified. : QDMhilhen permaall Af, Bal 2020212 fed) 6b Lil) eindr ALUSC™YYS ey Wahi pemenral if 012100317 pe aden Hated DWhelier pezpendent-onby rrénialivid) ashy to daclese Lah fidprert tL) Gent trrteribiiyy hearing To // U/ /} ? DWheliu respondent prtpihy p bhont pugelialty Wher lomissed wtthirt a fll record, althngh pepussted, | aT Locor. 70 Hipehs Perkr10nW WAP-CR YF AOA, Ofte. [216 HES CLfwus utile FLtéo tree lw DiS ndsseL tHe (24t)0F ls _ Stout tp Be_Lsup len P(t 2A573) Merionrmus_ls_ pb! quate lhejee (02s Parloenst LS (LESeATED LMUNTRaVéeFFH0._ éU1 tile of (Cerna, D?c mess A lol) Sth — Vu T_ 70 QltArTHTHIBGAS ConPris Arh St Dell Atkts rehielG, LU-SOV30 Lint Tite RUCTH Oued ii1T Gleorats fletite 12 Mb sdls1Et, Pag Axio. Of A-Prpes. Attia lW=(3— 0A Yl ¢AP) Howedlye Luts Deeley, a | oe | SSS TABLE CONS — LYMM OWS. ae | — WWispemo —