Whether Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), renders invalid the imposition of Petitioner's sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm during commission of a drug trafficking offense, under U.S.S.G. Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1), and/or, whether a change in statutory interpretation that does affect the sentencing Guidelines implicates the safety-valve clause of § 2255

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1. Whether Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), renders oo invalid the impesition'of Petitioner's sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm during commission of a drug trafficking offense, under U.S.S.G. Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1), and/or, whether a change in statutory interpretation that does affect the senten. ; cing Guidelines implicates the safety-valve clause of § 2255. 2. Whether a Habeas Corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241 grants district courts authority to review a claim that Petitioner's sentence is | invalid, when current precedent foreclosed the claim at the time : of Petitioner's prior Habeas Corpus motion, but an intervening ; Supreme Court precedent changed the construction of the statute . and the new statutory interpretation applies retroactively. . |