No. 22-5072
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process evidence-rule-701 evidentiary-standards federal-rules-of-evidence law-enforcement-testimony opinion-evidence uniform-standards witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should set limits on what law enforcement testimony should be admitted as opinion evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 701
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should set limits on what law enforcement testimony should be admitted as opinion evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 701.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Basil Bey
Patrick Joseph Egan — Fox Rothschild LLP, Petitioner
Patrick Joseph Egan — Fox Rothschild LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent