Whether petitioner's due process of law was violated by detectives' illegal seizure of petitioner's settlements while in public, violating petitioner's 4th and 5th Amendment rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED l, li’ hevh, a dhas , | 7 h . 7 Fe}isioners lesz Conicfion Pebhiticn | as ONG 9 ble. Mert, OF Counsel, bere fond bli. AsSisfanie ee he fatle? fe advance the Aro that Fed! prone Could LOT nous GB perry latte his innde Bin Qe ee ane dn telligeny WGnE A Lishis, furguany te Minench ~ Arizona 384 U5, G26 . a CEES ey 5: 436, 66 6.64 1602, 16 L.Ed. 22.694 Beleuse oF the Severe. inchility tor Comdrol Ins Hrcghg Qaned actlors, Due te jhe Hemleicy/ and Sucidal LT dag sions | Caused by bepresse cd heaackice of Lis D), aghnosed Meo Disorcles J. Ghether [Ef toners Due Fretes of Law twas Viole) L by De yecties Gerabele and Whwedklen where Derettites Tlegally "S@zed Petitiones $tlements while in al Pydke 6416," Violating Petrtiones "Cpand W444, Amerdprrds, Lr, lyhether fephones Due (pocess of Lau wag 4bfafec by the Trial Court, By alletulns festsoney’ Teselty* Cetzed Sttement as admissable,