Steven Martinez v. Christopher Gomez, Warden
HabeasCorpus
Did the court of appeals apply the wrong model form motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT APPLY THE WRONG MODEL FORM MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U,S,C, § 2255 (e); FOR PETITIONER TO PROCEED IN BRINGING A CLAIM OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT IN RESPONDENTS EXECUTING A VOID (J&C) PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 4001 (a)? J I.° DOES RESPONDENT(S) HAVE THE AUTHORITY UNDER PRISON PROGRAM STATEMENT 5380.06, TO EXECUTE A LIFE TERM OF IMPRISONMENT ON A VOID (J&C); THAT HAS BEEN DISMISSED ON PETITIONER, WHICH ARE UTILIZING TO RECEIVE COST OF INCARCERATION FEE? II. IS IT LEGAL TO BE IN RESPONDENT(S) CUSTODY TO PROGRAM STATEMENT 2011.12, INDEFINITELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 4001; WHEN PETITIONER NEVER SIGNED A CONTRACT; OR WAS UNDER THE PRESENTMENT OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT? III. IS RESPONDENT(S) IN VIOLATION OF PETITIONERS! CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, LAWS AND TREATIES OF THE UNITED STATES, IN DETAINING PETITIONER WITHOUT A CHARGE TO 18 U.S.C. § 4001 (a)? | : i