No. 22-5081

Palani Karupaiyan, et al. v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 11th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process federal-procedure foreign-sovereign-immunities-act jurisdictional-challenge racial-discrimination sovereign-immunity standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-12-02 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When USCA does not have jurisdiction to Constitutional challenges, US Supreme Court has (Original) Jurisdiction for the [following] reliefs petitioner(s) prayed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | a)When USCA does not have jurisdiction to | Constitutional challenges, US Supreme Court has’ . (Original) Jurisdiction for the [following] reliefs . | ; petitioner(s) prayed | b) Did USCA 8rd Circuit fail to vacate the Sua Sponte dismissal of Dist Court? ) c) USCA affirming Dist Court’s dismissal of a complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) or fail to state claims is error? . d) Dismissing claims against United States under 7 sovereign immunity when the parental | rights/Civil rights were violated . and Kids injuries is error? . , oe _e) Dismissing claims against India under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) is error? f) Dismissing claims against New Jersey under 11th | amendment or any immunity is error? , g) Woodbridge Defendants are also dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim? , 2 h) Lower Courts failure to exercise supplemental . jurisdiction for state-law claims is error i) USCA ruling that officer's (Gandhi) isolated use of a : racial slur or epithet by itself does not violate the . Constitution Officer Gandhi is error j) Lower Court denying to appoint attorney or guarding ad litem to petitioner(s) is error k) Lower Court denying post judgment motions against India, US, NJ and Woodbridge is error. l) USCA 34 circuit ruling that Section 1981 and 1983 and Civil rights act 1866 applicable only under employment is error? II

Docket Entries

2022-12-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-10-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)

Attorneys

Palani Karupaiyan
Palani Karupaiyan — Petitioner