No. 22-5096
IFP
Tags: citizen-rights civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federalism judicial-system legal-procedure legislative-overreach separation-of-powers state-attorney state-attorney-general
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state's attorney can enact legislation that violates state and federal constitutional rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : WHETHER A STATE'S ATTORNEY SHOULD BE ' ALLOWED TO ENACT LEGISLATION ON THEIR OWN THAT WOULD VIOLATE THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EACH CITIZEN OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IL. WHETHER THE STATE OF ILLINOIS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO USE THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AS A POLITICAL WEAPON TO DENY A CITIZEN | THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS -1
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)