No. 22-5099
Erwin Whitter v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advisal-statute burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process legal-rights public-defender right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner has a right to be granted extended time to secure counsel, the right to obtain the burden of proof, and the right to the Sixth Amendment (Advisal Statute) which was not advised by the Spartanburg appointed Public Defender
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | (1) The right to be granted extended time to secure counsel. (2) The Right to Obtain Burden of Proof. (i) The Right to the Sixth Amendment (Advisal Statute) which was not advised by the Spartanburg appointed Public Defender.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-27
Waiver of right of respondent Garland, Attorney General to respond filed.
2022-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)
2022-04-28
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
Garland, Attorney General
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent