No. 22-510
Jody Lombardo, et al. v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights detainee-death due-process excessive-force law-enforcement police-misconduct police-restraint qualified-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-29
(distributed 9 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether officers are entitled to qualified immunity when they put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the floor and push into his back until he dies, even though the person struggled to breathe before dying
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED When officers put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the floor and push into his back until he dies, are they entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law because the person struggled to breathe before dying?
Docket Entries
2023-07-07
Electronic materials returned to the U.S.D.C.-Eastern District of Missouri (three CDs).
2023-07-07
Record returned to the U.S.C.A.-8th Circuit (1 box).
2023-06-30
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-510_26p2.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-12
Rescheduled.
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-06-05
Rescheduled.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-30
Rescheduled.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-22
Rescheduled.
2023-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-12
Rescheduled.
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-04-27
Electronic materials received from the U.S.D.C.-Eastern District of Missouri. The remaining record is available on PACER.
2023-04-18
Record received from the U.S.C.A.-8th Circuit (1 box).
2023-04-10
Record Requested.
2023-03-30
Reply of petitioners Jody Lombardo, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-13
Brief of respondents City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including March 13, 2023.
2023-02-02
Response to motion for an extension of time from petitioner Jody Lombardo, et al. filed.
2023-01-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2023 to April 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-09
Response Requested. (Due February 8, 2023)
2023-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-30
Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-30
Brief amicus curiae of Professor Seth Stoughton filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-28
Waiver of right of respondents City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)
2022-09-13
Application (22A220) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until November 26, 2022.
2022-09-09
Application (22A220) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 27, 2022 to November 26, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
City of St. Louis, et al.
Andrew David Wheaton — City of St. Louis Law Department, Respondent
Andrew David Wheaton — City of St. Louis Law Department, Respondent
Jody Lombardo, et al.
Jonathan Ellis Taylor — Gupta Wessler PLLC, Petitioner
Jonathan Ellis Taylor — Gupta Wessler PLLC, Petitioner
Professor Seth Stoughton
Amy Mason Saharia — Williams & Connolly LLP, Amicus
Amy Mason Saharia — Williams & Connolly LLP, Amicus
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Steven Edwards Art — Loevy & Loevy, Amicus
Steven Edwards Art — Loevy & Loevy, Amicus