Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment requires that a jury, rather than a judge, resolve whether prior crimes were 'committed on occasions different from one another' for purposes of applying the 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing enhancement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED This petition provides this Court with the opportunity to resolve a question that was raised, but not addressed, by this Court’s recent decision in Wooden v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 1063, 1068 n. 3 (2022): Whether the Sixth Amendment requires that a jury, rather than a judge, resolve whether prior crimes were “committed on occasions different from one another” for purposes of applying the 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing enhancement.
2023-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-05
Reply of petitioner Nathaniel Daniels filed.
2022-11-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-10-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 21, 2022.
2022-10-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 20, 2022 to November 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-20
Response Requested. (Due October 20, 2022)
2022-09-14
Letter of petitioner Nathaniel Daniels filed. (Distributed)
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)