No. 22-5112

Roberto Hernandez-Aldama v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-standard fifth-amendment judicial-interpretation methamphetamine sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals violated the defendant's Fifth Amendment right to due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals violated the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to due process where the government presented evidence regarding just one type of methamphetamine (Ice), the district court found the defendant responsible for a different type of methamphetamine (methamphetamine (actual)), and the court of appeals affirmed the district court’s finding based on its inaccurate conclusion that the government and the district court had referred to the two types of methamphetamine interchangeably. i

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2022)

Attorneys

Roberto Hernandez-Aldama
Anne Margaret HayesAnne M. Hayes, Attorney, Petitioner
Anne Margaret HayesAnne M. Hayes, Attorney, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent