No. 22-5112
Roberto Hernandez-Aldama v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-standard fifth-amendment judicial-interpretation methamphetamine sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals violated the defendant's Fifth Amendment right to due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals violated the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to due process where the government presented evidence regarding just one type of methamphetamine (Ice), the district court found the defendant responsible for a different type of methamphetamine (methamphetamine (actual)), and the court of appeals affirmed the district court’s finding based on its inaccurate conclusion that the government and the district court had referred to the two types of methamphetamine interchangeably. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2022)
Attorneys
Roberto Hernandez-Aldama
Anne Margaret Hayes — Anne M. Hayes, Attorney, Petitioner
Anne Margaret Hayes — Anne M. Hayes, Attorney, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent