No. 22-5113
Jerald Francis Gray v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review bail bail-reform-act bail-review circuit-split detention-standard liberty-interest standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What standard of review should courts of appeals apply when reviewing district court bail decisions?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED What standard of review should courts of appeals apply when reviewing district court bail decisions, given the important liberty interest at stake and the need for meaningful appellate review to safeguard erroneous deprivations of liberty?
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-10-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-09-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 28, 2022.
2022-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 28, 2022 to October 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-29
Response Requested. (Due September 28, 2022)
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2022)
Attorneys
Jerald Gray
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent