No. 22-5126
Davis Lamar Brooks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-commitment conditional-release due-process fifth-circuit haldol-injection involuntary-medication involuntary-treatment mental-health preponderance-of-evidence standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-fifth-circuit-erred-by-affirming-the-district-court's-denial-of-mr-brooks'-motion-for-unconditional-release
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) | Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the district court’s denial of Mr. Brooks’ Motion for Unconditional Release. 2) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the district court’s order for Region 8 Mental Health Services to administer Haldol injections to Mr. Brooks in the specific dosage amount of 100 milligrams. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Davis Brooks
Thomas C. Turner — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent