Does the court believe that 'cheating' and violating established law/rules must be addressed with an imposition of the clear penalties so listed?

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW/14.1 ue 1) Does the court believe that ‘ cheating’, and violating established law/rules must be addressed with an imposition of the clear penalties so listed? 2) Does the court.impart ‘ equality ’ as relates to self representation ? 3) When presented with overwhelming material evidence, does the court abide by the standard ‘ of ‘preponderance of evidence’ to reach a decision. 4) Will the court decide the case based on merit, or give an advantage to An established law firm or trillion dollar corporation? 5) In keeping with the rules of conciseness, brevity, and clarity, will the court view ‘ meritorious ‘submission which clearly shows the abundance of ; favorable evidence of petitioner over respondent? 7 ) Petitioner has attended 532 depositions over a ten year period. Familiarity with cases has shown no boundaries, with regard to violating rules by certain attorneys. Will the court punish the offenders? 8) Can petitioner expect different and fair treatment in light ofthe Abysmal actions of Judge Liman, Court of Appeals, and FINRA arbitration? Thank you for the opportunity, to state my questions