Should this Court overrule Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, 189 S. Ct. 1743 (2019), affirmed on 54 (1 dissent), or hold that a defendant in a civil action cannot remove the claim under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1441(a) because all defendants who have been properly joined and served must join in or consent to the removal of the action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1446(b)(2)(A)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should this Court overrule Home Depot U.S.A., Ine. v. Jackson, 189 8. Ct. 1743 (2019), affirmed on 54 (1 dissent), or hold that a defendant in a civil action cannot remove the claim under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1441(a) because all defendants who have been properly joined and served must join in or consent to the removal of the action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1446(b)(2)(A)? 2. Should this Court overrule Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984), or hold that The Eleventh Amendment prevents federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over state defendants? 8. Should this Court overrule Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Lavoie, 475 U.S. 818 (1986), or hold that under the Due Process Clause, no judge could be a judge in his own case or be permitted to try cases where he had an interest in the outcome? 4. Should this Court overrule Adkins v. FE. L DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331 (1948), or hold that a petitioner could not be denied an opportunity to commence, prosecute, or defend an action in a federal court solely because poverty made it impossible to pay the litigation costs?