Has a criminal Defendant's constitutional right to self-representation been violated by a trial court, if that court unreasonably delays the Defendant's request for self-representation and the Defendant suffered prejudice due to the court's delay?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1.) Has a criminal Defendant’s constitutional right to self-representation been violated by a trial court, if that court unreasonably delays the Defendant’s request for selfrepresentation and the Defendant suffered prejudice due to the courts delay? | 2.) Concerning a Pro Se, Defendant, does a trial court violate McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 | U.S. 168, 174 (1984) when the court does not allow a Defendant to control the organization and content of their own defense, to make motions or to argue points of law | in a case before a court where that Defendant desires to represent them self? | 3.) Can the State argue against a criminal defendant an authentication issue for the purpose of admissibility, relating to evidence in a criminal trial, if the documentary evidence in | question, were secured by the Government or State, from another Government or State department or agency and has been marked by the Government or State as “counsel only materia!” so as to restrict it’s availability to that criminal defendant? | : | | | | i